Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1173 days older than the more expensive Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G6900 - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - £20.36 vs £69.30
- Up to 71% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G6900 - £0.15 vs £0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£20.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £20.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8593 minutes ago
Buy for £69.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8592 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900K | vs | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |