Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-11900F - 217 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-11900F - £1.94 vs £2.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £395.64 vs £420.01
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.94/FPS
100%
Price, £
£420.01
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £420.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Buy for £395.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |