Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 233 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Core i9-11900F - 242 vs 237 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £346.84 vs £395.64
- Up to 14% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-11900F - £1.43 vs £1.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £395.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6546 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
242
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6545 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900F | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |