Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 83 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-14700K.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-14700K - 157 vs 156 FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £324.00 vs £499.98
- Up to 35% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-14900F - £2.08 vs £3.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
157
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.18/FPS
65%
Price, £
£499.98
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
156
99%
Value, £/FPS
£2.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£324
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £324 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |