Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3502 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 145% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9590 - 606 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-9590 - £491.10 vs £535.43
- Up to 63% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9590 - £0.81 vs £2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 150 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
606
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£491.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £491.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
Buy for £535.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |