Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 479 vs 427 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - £568.99 vs £1455.00
- Up to 65% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - £1.19 vs £3.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900 - 48 vs 32 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
479
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£568.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £568.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Buy for £1,455 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 48 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |