Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £424.09 vs £570.81
- Up to 11% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900 - £3.75 vs £4.20 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - 136 vs 113 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
83%
Value, £/FPS
£3.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£424.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £424.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
Buy for £570.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |