Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £424.09 vs £432.97
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900KF - 166 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900KF - £2.61 vs £3.07 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £424.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£432.97
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £432.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |