Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Core i7-6700 - 735 vs 711 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £113.81 vs £424.09
- Up to 72% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10900KF - £0.16 vs £0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
735
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
28%
Price, £
£424.09
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £424.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
711
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £113.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |