Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2752 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £113.81 vs £491.88
- Up to 74% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-13900KS - £0.71 vs £2.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 13% better in Halo Infinite than Core i7-6700 - 181 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
160
88%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £113.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 430 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.72/FPS
26%
Price, £
£491.88
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for £491.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |