The Core i9-10900K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G1820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-10900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 53 vs 125 Watts
Core i9-10900K vs Celeron G1820 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
168
87%
Min 1% FPS
113
88%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.03/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900K vs Celeron G1820 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900K vs Celeron G1820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900K vs Celeron G1820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| $547.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
