Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 891 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £507.35 vs £568.99
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 34% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10850K - 549 vs 411 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10850K - £1.04 vs £1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £507.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
549
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£568.99
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £568.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |