Buy on Amazon
£230.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP $409
Availability
MSRP $409
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 5152 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Core i7-860
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - £230.18 vs £343.97
- Up to 25% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-14700K - £1.09 vs £1.46 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-860 - 236 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
211
89%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£230.18
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-860 - processors (Intel Core i7-xxx, Socket H (LGA 1156), i7-860, 64-bit, L3, 0.65 - 1.4 V)
Buy for £230.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Core i7-14700K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
236
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.46/FPS
75%
Price, £
£343.97
66%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-14700K Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for £343.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Core i7-14700K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-860 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 20 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
