Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4522 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-860 - 454 vs 370 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-860 - £70.00 vs £165.50
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-860 - £0.15 vs £0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 58 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £165.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-860 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |