Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3304 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-840QM - 191 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-840QM | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |