Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4237 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 62% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-840QM - 222 vs 137 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-840QM | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |