Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3791 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-840QM - 120 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-840QM | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
