The Core i7-7700 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-7700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i7-7700 vs Celeron G3930T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, £
£162.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
91%
Min 1% FPS
113
92%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-7700 vs Celeron G3930T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7700 vs Celeron G3930T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7700 vs Celeron G3930T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-7700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
