Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930T - 287 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
