Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3902 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3612QM - 167 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£639.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £639.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3612QM | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |