Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3612QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 37% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-3612QM - 243 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3612QM | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
