Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4102 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-2675QM - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£568.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £568.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8586 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2675QM | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |