Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4471 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2675QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-2675QM - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
241
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2675QM | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |