Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Core i5-7400
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - £137.08 vs £238.62
- Up to 37% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-12600K - £0.78 vs £1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Deathloop than Core i5-7400 - 193 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
175
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£137.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £137.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.24/FPS
63%
Price, £
£238.62
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for £238.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |