The Core i5-5257U is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-5257U
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 28 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
The Core i5-5257U is better in every way
Core i5-5257U vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-5257U
Mar 1st, 2015
Average FPS
176
100%
Min 1% FPS
117
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
97%
Min 1% FPS
114
97%
Price, £
£121.07
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Core i5-5257U vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5257U vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5257U vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5257U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-5257U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
$315.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
28 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
Intel Iris 6100 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |