Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3443 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Core i5-3470T
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - £38.95 vs £238.62
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12600K - £0.33 vs £1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3470T - 152 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
117
77%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£38.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9845 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.57/FPS
21%
Price, £
£238.62
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for £238.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470T | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |