Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3655 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Core i5-3340M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-3340M - 178 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3340M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
