Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3229 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 34% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3340M - 155 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
155
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£325.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £325.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3340M | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |