Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4238 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Core i5-3320M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 65% better in Rust than Core i5-3320M - 259 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 28 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
259
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£311.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £311.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3320M | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |