Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4155 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Core i5-3320M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-3320M - 134 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 32 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3320M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3320M | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
