The Core i5-3320M is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
Core i5-3320M vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
168
99%
Min 1% FPS
113
99%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, £
£121.07
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Core i5-3320M vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-3320M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
