Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £238.66 vs £2511.32
- Up to 91% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-12400 - £0.83 vs £8.75 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £238.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |