Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4034 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-390M - 253 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
253
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-390M | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |