Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4378 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in F1 22 than Core i3-390M - 289 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£552.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £552.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-390M | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |