The Core i3-3220T is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-9400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-9400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
90%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, £
£176.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.94/FPS
100%
Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3220T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
