In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3220T is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $5 more expensive!
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 7 5700G
- Up to 57% faster in Battlefield 6 – 96 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 57% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Apr 13, 2021 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 2% cheaper – $185.29 vs $189.95
- Up to 2% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.93 vs $3.11/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Ryzen 7 5700G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
64%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
64%
Price, $
$189.95
97%
Value, $/FPS
$3.11/FPS
62%
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Average FPS
96 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
100%
Price, $
$185.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Ryzen 7 5700G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Ryzen 7 5700G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700G Apr 13th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
