The Celeron G6900 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 3950X, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's £738.51 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- Up to 92% cheaper – £60.49 vs £799.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 9 3950X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3950X
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 2 threads
Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 9 3950X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
99%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£60.49
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 9 3950X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 9 3950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 9 3950X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G6900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $749.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
