Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £69.30 vs £435.39
- Up to 83% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900K - £0.25 vs £1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Celeron G6900 - 289 vs 279 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7301 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
17%
Price, £
£435.39
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for £435.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7301 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |