Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Celeron G3920 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1892 days newer than Celeron G3920.
Advantages of Celeron G3920
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 17% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3920 - 383 vs 328 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3920 - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3920
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3920 | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
