Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £119.95 vs £433.50
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-14900K - £0.57 vs £1.45 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 41% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 298 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
71%
Value, £/FPS
£0.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
298
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.45/FPS
39%
Price, £
£433.5
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |