In Atomfall, the Celeron G3900 is slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $403 cheaper!
Celeron G3900
- Up to 90% cheaper – $44.04 vs $447.16
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall – $0.23 vs $1.80/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
189 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
76%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
9%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
