Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1610 - 224 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
