Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3585 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 245 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |