Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4390 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 29% better in Elden Ring than Celeron B815 - 139 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 32 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
139
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£570.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £570.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8674 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |