Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4029 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 524% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron B815 - 106 vs 17 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 32 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
106
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.69/FPS
100%
Price, £
£497.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £497.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 408 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |