Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Core i9-12900F

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Core i9-12900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

3.9 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Logo
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (16C/32T, 72 MB Cache, up to 4.3 GHz Max Boost)

Buy for £1,412.1 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 214 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-12900F

2.4 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i9-12900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-12900F Desktop Processor 30M Cache, up to 5.10 GHz

Buy for £388 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 213 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

3.9 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Logo
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (16C/32T, 72 MB Cache, up to 4.3 GHz Max Boost)

Buy for £1,412.1 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 214 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-12900F

2.4 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i9-12900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-12900F Desktop Processor 30M Cache, up to 5.10 GHz

Buy for £388 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 213 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 539 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F

  • Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 212 vs 192 FPS
  • Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £388.0 vs £1412.1
  • Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £1.83 vs £7.35 per FPS
This is a free version of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0.
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020


FPS

192

90%

Value, £/FPS

£7.35/FPS

24%

Price, £

£1412.1

27%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (16C/32T, 72 MB Cache, up to 4.3 GHz Max Boost)

Buy for £1,412.1 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 214 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-12900F Logo
Core i9-12900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


FPS

212

100%

Value, £/FPS

£1.83/FPS

100%

Price, £

£388

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-12900F Desktop Processor 30M Cache, up to 5.10 GHz

Buy for £388 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 213 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020

Intel Core i9-12900F Logo
Core i9-12900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020


Single-Core

1676

66%

Multi-Core

12353

88%

Intel Core i9-12900F Logo
Core i9-12900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


Single-Core

2539

100%

Multi-Core

13890

100%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Logo

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

vs
Intel Core i9-12900F Logo

Intel Core i9-12900F

Jul 14th, 2020Release Date
Jan 4th, 2022
Ryzen ThreadripperCollectionCore i9
Castle PeakCodenameAlder Lake
AMD Socket WRX8SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16Cores16
32
Threads24
3.9 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.4 GHz
4.3 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.1 GHz
280 WTDPNot Available
7 nm
Process Size10 nm
39.0x
Multiplier24.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.