Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 539 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 212 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £388.0 vs £1412.1
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £1.83 vs £7.35 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
192
90%
Value, £/FPS
£7.35/FPS
24%
Price, £
£1412.1
27%
Buy for £1,412.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |