Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2633 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than FX-6350 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
168
92.81767955801105%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2058 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |