Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2266 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 87% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1840 - 181 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
97
53.591160220994475%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1876 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
30.13126491646778%
Multi-Core
854
6.913300412855176%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |