Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 1130 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - 278 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
256
92.08633093525181%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
39.02439024390244%
Multi-Core
1043
7.501438434982739%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |