Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 626 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 136 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Single-Core
1180
70.40572792362768%
Multi-Core
7221
85.69902682174224%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |